Enerdyne Solutions Enerdyne Solutions
HomeProducts & ServicesTechnical InfoExamplesLearn MoreContact UsAbout Us
Thermal Interfaces
Learn More
Hot Problems
Cool Solutions
PCMA Reliability
Heat Spreaders
Thermal Interfaces
TIM Test Methods
TIM Performance Measures

One or more heat dissipation or cooling components are typically attached to a chip in order to cool it. In the typical air-cooled thermal solution a chip or its package would use a heat sink to conduct heat away from the chip and a fan to then transfer that heat to the ambient. Other cooling solutions approaches could employ a cold plate, heat pipe, or other technology to remove the chip’s heat.

Regardless of the cooling device used, it is not advisable to simply place it on the chip. The reason is that there is no practical and feasible way of making both the chip surface and the cooling device surface perfectly flat enough or free enough of small scale surface asperities. These microscopic irregularities prevent the surfaces from making complete and continuous contact; in fact the majority of the surfaces will end up separated from each other:

Trapped air in interfaces is thermally insulating

By default, these spaces will fill with air which is thermally insulative. The result is that, no matter how good the thermal performance of the cooling device the thermal resistance in this gap will render the overall solution intolerably poor.

The solution is to displace the air in the gap with something that is a better thermal conductor—a Thermal Interface Material or TIM. While a TIM may serve other purposes such as attaching or adhering the surfaces together its primary purpose is to provide complete wetting between the chip to be cooled and the rest of the thermal solution (such as a spreader or heat sink.) Wetting is the ability of the material to completely fill the interstices, displacing all air. The better the wetting of the TIM, the less air trapped, and the lower the thermal resistance.

Increasingly chips are being packaged with heat spreader lids; current examples include the Intel Pentium and AMD Athlon64. These lids, known as Integrated Heat Spreaders (IHS), provide both thermal spreading ability and mechanical strength to protect the die. (Some of this protection is required due to the increasingly high clamping pressures used to attach heat sinks; the increased pressure tends to minimize the gap and increase the conformity between the surfaces.) These packages use a TIM, called TIM1, between the die and the IHS:

Package with TIM1 between die and IHS

The typical air-cooled solution for this kind of package would use another TIM, called TIM2 between the IHS and the heat sink base.

The importance of a TIM is not proportional to its volume in the overall thermal solution. About 40% of the thermal resistance in the overall solution lies in the TIM1 layer between the die and the lid:

Percentage of TIM1 Contribution to Overall Thermal Resistance
Source: "Materials for Thermal Management", Dr. Nancy Dean,
Advanced Packaging, March 2003, p.16

Many current designs are thermally inferior, exacerbating the problems of designing a feasible back-end (heat sink and fan) thermal solution. Steve Pawlowski, Director of Intel’s Microprocessor Lab stated at a developers’ conference in Taipei recently: "There's a certain [thermal] transfer coefficient between the die and the package. If you can't come up with a better package that will allow that heat transfer to occur from the die, no matter what you do on the outside, it’s going to be difficult." Addressing the thermal transfer bottleneck at the first interface, at the die level, is a critical challenge for today’s thermal engineers and scientists.

The selection of the various components within a thermal solution has a huge impact on the constraints imposed (or relaxed) on the other components and on the overall results. The use of an extremely high-performing TIM can allow the use of a simpler and cheaper heat sink, or even the elimination of the fan. The slightly increased cost of a better TIM may be more than recovered by cost reductions elsewhere in the overall thermal solution.

It is cheaper and more efficient to cool a component the closer the cooling solution is to the heat source. For example, you can produce a chilled glass of lemonade more efficiently and at less cost by putting ice in it than by air-conditioning the surrounding room. Similarly, cost and efficiency measures in cooling a chip are improved by increasing the thermal performance of the material directly adjacent to that chip—the TIM.

For all these reasons the choice of a TIM has perhaps the largest impact of any component selection on the performance, cost, and other attributes of the overall solution.

TIMs include greases, gels, pads, pastes, waxes, phase-change materials, and particle-filled materials. Using a solder would provide the improved thermal performance of an all-metal heat path, but the problem of mismatched CTE between die and lid material makes this choice difficult. Intel has recently started using an Indium solder as a TIM1 in some of its chip products. Others have experimented with Low Melt Alloys—some commercial products use them today, but their adoption has been limited due to concerns about the reliability of those formulations.

Find out how Indigo compares to other thermal interface materials.
 
Enerdyne Solutions